March 11, 2013
FMT
LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail Ah boon:
12:09 PM (13.03.2013)
I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1
that the
party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is
just
mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers
during the
whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial
itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the
forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws
for
his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the
name
of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag
him
into this frustration and anger pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never
took
the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a
fair
trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was
never
going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his
now
ally Datuk Yusof.
If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him
these questions
and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for
it.
- Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
- How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
- Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
- Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
- Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to
withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence
team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder
the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in
conning,
deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is
no
Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the
overseas
experts
The surprising factor here is why no one
has
ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts,
Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David
Wells. Contrary to what the general public have
been
made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were
here,
they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number
of
days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come
from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his
lawyers.
So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do
know
the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons
known
close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions
as
to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why
not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former
convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks
funding his legal expences, what is wrong in
having Datuks
funding the wedding
of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful.
The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that
the
Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored
the
protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and
decided to
do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in
his
rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the
“break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on
this soon. This
drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of
Anwar’s
semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to
a break in
chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples,
the
evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of
corroborating
Saiful’s evidence.
Conclusion for
Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using
Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role
in order to garner
votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that
bit
of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I
really hope he
sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just
mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring
you.
I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the
public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me)
in
action. And remember the e-mails,
Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get
me!
The writer, a
former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s
Sodomy 2 trial for the defence
0 Comments